Differences between revisions 7 and 8
Revision 7 as of 2010-12-30 18:26:26
Size: 4346
Comment: Start on page for utf-8.
Revision 8 as of 2010-12-30 18:52:05
Size: 4346
Comment: Correct table.
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 25: Line 25:
|| [:grupper/standard/digistan-analyse/utf8:ISO/IEC 10646 using UTF8]|| ? || ? || OK || ? || ? || || [:grupper/standard/digistan-analyse/utf8:ISO/IEC 10646 using UTF8]|| ? || ? ||  ? || ? || ? ||

This is an evaluation of the specifications [http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/FAD/Vedlegg/IKT-politikk/Referansekatalogen_versjon2.pdf required or recommended] by the Norwegian government for use in the government sector. The specifications are evaluated against the Digistan [http://www.digistan.org/open-standard:definition definition of a Free and Open Standard].

  • The Digital Standards Organization defines free and open standard as follows:
    1. A free and open standard is immune to vendor capture at all stages in its life-cycle. Immunity from vendor capture makes it possible to freely use, improve upon, trust, and extend a standard over time. (no-capture)
    2. The standard is adopted and will be maintained by a not-for-profit organisation, and its ongoing development occurs on the basis of an open decision-making procedure available to all interested parties. (organisation)
    3. The standard has been published and the standard specification document is available freely. It must be permissible to all to copy, distribute, and use it freely. (published)
    4. The patents possibly present on (parts of) the standard are made irrevocably available on a royalty-free basis. (royalty-free)
    5. There are no constraints on the re-use of the standard. (no-constraints)
    The economic outcome of a free and open standard, which can be measured, is that it enables perfect competition between suppliers of products based on the standard.

Evaluated so far

Name

no-capture

organisation

published

royalty-free

no-constrains

[:grupper/standard/digistan-analyse/ogg-theora:Ogg Theora]

OK

OK

OK

OK

OK

http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Is_Ogg_Theora_a_free_and_open_standard_.html

The evaluation of individual organisation is [:grupper/standard/digistan-analyse/organisations:on a separate page].

Left to evaluate

Name

no-capture

organisation

published

royalty-free

no-constrains

Document formats

[:grupper/standard/digistan-analyse/utf8:ISO/IEC 10646 using UTF8]

?

?

?

?

?

HTML 4.01 (W3C 1999)

?

?

?

?

?

XHTML 1 (W3C 2000)

?

?

?

?

?

PDF 1.4

?

?

?

?

?

PDF 1.6

?

?

?

?

?

PDF 1.7 (ISO 32000-1)

?

?

?

?

?

PDF/A (ISO 19005-1)

?

?

?

?

?

ODF 1.0 (ISO/IEC 26300:2006)

?

?

?

?

?

ODF 1.1 (Oasis, februar 2007)

?

?

?

?

?

Multimedia formats

Theora 1.0 (Xiph.org 2008)

OK

OK

OK

OK

OK

Vorbis 1 (Xiph.org 2004)

OK

OK

OK

OK

OK

Ogg (RFC 3533, IETF 2003)

OK

OK

OK

OK

OK

[:grupper/standard/digistan-analyse/h264:H.264 (ISO/IEC 14496-10)]

?

?

No

No

?

AAC (ISO/IEC 13818-7:2003)

?

?

?

?

?

[:grupper/standard/digistan-analyse/mp3:MP3 (ISO 11172-3)]

?

?

?

?

?

MP4 (ISO/IEC 14496-10:2005)

?

?

?

?

?

FLAC 1.2.1 (Xiph.org 2007)

?

?

?

?

?

JPEG (ISO/IEC 10918-1)

?

?

?

?

?

PNG (ISO/ IEC 15948:2003)

?

?

?

?

?

SVG 1.1 (W3C januar 2003)

?

?

?

?

?

Procedures and meta-specs

WCAG 1.0 (W3C mai 1999)

?

?

?

?

?

Kravspesifikasjon for PKI i offentlig sektor

?

?

?

?

?

Elmer II-retningslinjene

?

?

?

?

?

Noark-5

?

?

?

?

?

EbXML-rammeverket fra KITH

?

?

?

?

?

Statens standardavtaler (Difi 2009)

?

?

?

?

?

grupper/standard/digistan-analyse (last edited 2015-11-29 21:27:04 by localhost)